Our Standards

We write for the player, not for the operator. A review states what a casino does well and where it falls short, and a positive verdict cannot be bought: commercial agreements never decide the score, the order of a list or the wording of a conclusion.

We only describe what we can verify. If a bonus term, a withdrawal limit or a game feature cannot be confirmed from a primary source, we say so plainly instead of guessing. Promotions change often, so every offer we mention carries the date we last checked it, and the operator's own terms always take precedence over our summary.

We keep gambling in proportion. Articles do not promise winnings, do not present casino games as a way to earn money and do not target anyone under 18. Wherever bonuses or deposits are discussed, we point to the limits and safer-gambling tools that UK-licensed operators are required to provide.

Our first source is always the operator itself: its website, the full bonus terms, the payments page and the answers its support team gives to our questions. For licensing we check the public register of the UK Gambling Commission and note the licence number and the company that holds it.

Game information comes from the studios that make the games — published RTP figures, volatility and rules — rather than from third-party summaries. Where a casino runs a lower RTP version of a slot, we report the figure shown inside that casino's own game info panel.

Player feedback from forums and review platforms helps us decide what to test, but we do not repeat individual claims as facts. A complaint pattern becomes part of a review only after we have reproduced it ourselves or seen it confirmed by the operator or an adjudicator.

Every review is tested on a real account. We register, verify identity, deposit with at least two payment methods and request a withdrawal, timing each step. Figures such as wagering requirements, maximum bet rules and processing times are copied from the live terms on the day of testing.

Numbers, licence details and quoted terms are checked one by one; anything that cannot be traced back to a source is removed or marked as unconfirmed.

Published reviews are revisited on a schedule and whenever an operator changes its terms, its licence status or its ownership. The date at the top of each article shows when it was last checked, not just when it was first written.

If you think something on this site is wrong or out of date, please tell us through the contact page. Name the page, quote the sentence and, if you can, link to the source that shows the correct information.

We acknowledge every report and review it against the original source. If we decide the text is accurate, we reply with the source we relied on.

We do not remove fair criticism of an operator at the operator's request, and we do not accept payment for corrections. Questions about how we earn money are answered on our advertising disclosure page.